As long as they consider it security-sensitive, they don't have to share it with anyone. "Further, the bill has a component that prevents manufacturers from being required to make tools, parts, and documentation available for any component that would disable or override antitheft security measures, which would encompass features like Face ID." Apple isn't giving away the farm. Very reasonable to assume they are supporting these bills "for the sake of right to repair".Īt any point when Apple does anything, all you have to do is trace it down to where they benefit most from it at the bottom line, then expand from there and you'll get the answers you're looking for. Once this is in place in California it will be much easier for them to get a right to repair bill that benefits themselves.Īpple claimed they were not selling new iPhones with chargers "for the sake of the environment". They want to be regulated because they control the senators who make the rules. It exists for their lobbyists, so when you try to get Right To Repair legislation passed, lobbyists can say 'we already do that, but nobody even uses it! We don't need to do anything more because nobody wants to fix their own stuff.' Apple did it in most Apple way possible, making it cost prohibitive and overly complicated. The Apple Self-service repair program isn't pointless. I think this four commennts from YouTube explain it all:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |